Main page of the IPP
Institute For Public Policy
Sound policies and effective governance - ideas for action
July 31, 2010    Bishkek time 04:01 English Russian
Recent articles

“The work of the mass media in conflict situations"

Experts on the current situation and the forthcoming referendum

"The Role of Civil Associations in Resolving Conflicts in Educational Institutions"

Recent roundtables


Multilingualism and tolerance

How does self-censorship affect the coverage of political conflicts?

Culture of Tolerance: The Problem of Formation

Useful links




Featured reports 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bakyt Beshimov:

“Kyrgyzstan: is democracy on the agenda for the country?”  

Valentin Bogatyrev:

“Status of formal political institutes and interactions with informal political structures in Kyrgyzstan”

 

Muratbek Imanaliev:

 “Informal institutes as “rules of a political game” in Kyrgyzstan”

 

 

 

 

Expert Discussion on Tripartism

 
On December 12, 2006, the Institute for Public Policy hosted an expert discussion on “Tripartism as a prerequisite for the development of socially responsible business” with the participation of local experts.

 

The enhancement and development of social partnership between the state, employer, and employee on an equal basis is one of the main requirements for constructive resolution of contradictions between the subjects of social and labor relations. However, there are important questions regarding what necessities and preconditions exist for the development of tripartite relations.

 

Participants of the discussion highlighted that the state has not been playing its role in the development of social-labor relations. For the last five to six years, it has been trying to abandon its function of management instead of setting and protecting adequate rules of the game. The rhetoric about “socially responsible” business has become nothing but an attempt to shift the responsibility from the state to business. The current situation demonstrates that the state lacks, first of all, a clear understanding of the role of business in the state economy, and secondly, a clear understanding of how the state should help and foster domestic business.

 

It was also stated that the “employer” component in the “state-employer-employee” triad is practically missing in legal terms. The character of the current legislation is coercive and punitive, and does nothing to protect the employer. There is no business index in the country, which is related to the fact that the state has been allowing the “rule of the telephone call” instead of establishing and enforcing standard and commonly accepted rules of the game.

 

The introduction and development of tripartite relations would promote the protection and development of business - the main employer and creator of jobs. Only when they are confident about their future can businesses serve as a stimulator of the economic development of the country.

 

The “employee” component, represented by trade unions (“profsoyuzy”), has not been playing its proper role either. Such unions remain a part of the state, and their activities essentially come down to the protection of their property. Still, it was stated that the very existence of labor unions provides an opportunity, if they are appropriately reformed for an effective representation of employees in the “state-employer-employee” triad.

 

Experts identified two main challenges for the development of tripartism in the country. Firstly, there is a very weak tradition and culture of social dialogue in the country. Not long ago, the state served as both a regulator of social-labor relations and an employer, while representatives of employee’s interests – trade unions – were basically part of the Communist party.

 

Secondly, in the current situation, in which the state is weak and corrupt, business is vulnerable legally and employees are extremely dependent on employers due to a high unemployment rate.  Under such circumstances, there are serious doubts about the readiness of parties to establish and maintain tripartite communication.



Search    
The Institute for Public Policy is a Bishkek-based independent organization that was founded in April 2005. It aims at promoting formation of a practice of public policy and development of mechanisms of constructive interaction between state institutions, civil society, mass media and businesses. The Institute supports partner relations with many participants of public and political processes and aims at involving the public in the process of decision making.
    IPP news
The Institute for Public Policy has been ranked among the top think tanks in Eastern Europe.
The Institute for Public Policy took 18th place in the list of top 25 think tanks in Eastern Europe according to the Think Tank Index Rating published by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program from the University of Pennsylvania.

Call for applications
Bishkek Press Club (BPC) grants you a unique opportunity to participate in the Summer school of international journalism”.

“Water-energy policy of Kyrgyzstan in the context of developing geoeconomic and strategic resource in Central Asian region”
On February 22nd, 2008 there was a round-table at Bishkek Press Club on the topic “”Water-energy policy in Kyrgyzstan” with the participation of experts on water issues .

 
    Subscribe
 
    Donors
 
Development by Logicon
Designed by New Design Studio
42/1 Isanov Str. Bishkek 720017
KYRGYZSTAN
Tel: +996 (312) 90-62-40,90-62-30, 90-62-20
Email: office@ipp.kg
© Institute for Public Policy, 2005-2009
IPP materials represents a spectrum of views and do not necessarily
reflect the views of donors.