Main page of the IPP
Institute For Public Policy
Sound policies and effective governance - ideas for action
September 09, 2010    Bishkek time 22:15 English Russian
Recent articles

On the upcoming parliamentary election

“The work of the mass media in conflict situations"

Experts on the current situation and the forthcoming referendum

Recent roundtables


Multilingualism and tolerance

How does self-censorship affect the coverage of political conflicts?

Culture of Tolerance: The Problem of Formation

Useful links




Featured reports 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bakyt Beshimov:

“Kyrgyzstan: is democracy on the agenda for the country?”  

Valentin Bogatyrev:

“Status of formal political institutes and interactions with informal political structures in Kyrgyzstan”

 

Muratbek Imanaliev:

 “Informal institutes as “rules of a political game” in Kyrgyzstan”

 

 

 

 

Evaluation of Political Situation after April 19

Round table summary
Photo: Associated Press
The Institute for Public Policy held meeting of experts of the institute to discuss current political situation on April 20, 2007. The discussion was initiated in light of April 19 events, when authorities dispersed opposition rally that started on April 11, 2007 at the central square in Bishkek.

Round table participants stressed first of all that the April 19 event brought victory to neither side. According to the experts, such a confrontation weakened not only the opposition but also the authorities. “Events in Kyrgyzstan are in a new, unpredictable phase of development that can have serious consequences,” participants said.

Firstly, the April rally seriously discredited the opposition (opposition meaning one element of democracy, as a phenomenon, but not a particular group of people.) Experts said that most opposition leaders, who were for system changes, became hostages of the tactics chosen by the United Front leaders. “The rally was aimed at the quick achievement of announced goals, but there were no real preconditions for them and that is why the tactic was initially futile,” experts said. Statements of the “For reforms!” movement leaders saying that they suspend the rally and at the same time the silence of the United Front leaders, shows that there is a division in the processes between “reformists” and “front” members, experts said. According to them, all opposition forces will need time and they have to search for new formats for their activity to restore their positions.

Secondly, actions of the authorities prior to, during and after the rally demonstrated that they do not realize and undertake the necessary reforms. “The behavior of the authorities is penetrated by a desire to win, save itself or fight back, but not by understanding the need for real reforms for the country’s development and securing consent from among the population,” they said. According to participants, if the authorities continue conducting reforms only under pressure and threat, political tensions will only increase.

Round table participants said that activities of the authorities immediately after April 19 demonstrate their desire to “kill” opposition in moral and informational terms. One can observe that the role of law enforcement structures in politics is strengthening, and it is expected that along with information and legal accusations, authorities might start a “shadow” attack against the opposition activists. According to participants, such methods will not solve the problems of authority, but rather on the contrary, augment antagonism in society and lay the foundation for new tensions.

Thirdly, and most importantly, the April confrontation led to the regional division problem strengthening. It is evident, that both authority and opposition used regionalism as the main resource to mobilize support among the population, thus infecting politicians of various levels, and also ordinary people with a “spirit of revanchism”. Experts said that all political groups need to realize that in certain conditions regional division can occur in hours, and not only along a “north-south” divide. Both “south” and “north” can in their turns be divided into several other fragments.

Round table participants believe that every increase in regional tension creates and encourages the prerequisites for dictatorship, or the fragmentation of the country and society. “The role of local “batyrs” (heroes) strengthens with the background of a common disappointment in authority and opposition leaders, and already this year can be seen as a real threat to the country’s unity,” experts said.

Solutions to the problem of regional division first of all depend on the authority’s policy; the main player in the political field, experts said. According to experts, one of the solutions to the problem could be change of form of authority organization, giving it “corporate” structure. “Today it is almost impossible to conduct presidential elections in Kyrgyzstan because the country would divide into two parts,” experts said and “that is why it is necessary to find optimal ways out of the crisis.”

They said that the press plays an important role in the “promotion” of the regionalism, without even realizing it. “The very media creates symbols of regionalism and promotes odious figures. It is necessary to save the media from divisive tendencies, to agree and observe certain ethical norms in informing the population,” experts said.

In conclusion, participants expressed the hope that the authorities will not celebrate a “victory”, but will make real steps to reform the political system and preserve unity in society, and opposition leaders in their turn will continue to promote the creation of an effective and democratic state.




Search    
The Institute for Public Policy is a Bishkek-based independent organization that was founded in April 2005. It aims at promoting formation of a practice of public policy and development of mechanisms of constructive interaction between state institutions, civil society, mass media and businesses. The Institute supports partner relations with many participants of public and political processes and aims at involving the public in the process of decision making.
    IPP news
The Institute for Public Policy has been ranked among the top think tanks in Eastern Europe.
The Institute for Public Policy took 18th place in the list of top 25 think tanks in Eastern Europe according to the Think Tank Index Rating published by the Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program from the University of Pennsylvania.

Call for applications
Bishkek Press Club (BPC) grants you a unique opportunity to participate in the Summer school of international journalism”.

“Water-energy policy of Kyrgyzstan in the context of developing geoeconomic and strategic resource in Central Asian region”
On February 22nd, 2008 there was a round-table at Bishkek Press Club on the topic “”Water-energy policy in Kyrgyzstan” with the participation of experts on water issues .

 
    Subscribe
 
    Donors
 
Development by Logicon
Designed by New Design Studio
42/1 Isanov Str. Bishkek 720017
KYRGYZSTAN
Tel: +996 (312) 90-62-40,90-62-30, 90-62-20
Email: office@ipp.kg
© Institute for Public Policy, 2005-2009
IPP materials represents a spectrum of views and do not necessarily
reflect the views of donors.